The Intergenerational Transmission of Family Values: A Comparison between Teenagers and Parents in Taiwan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inspired by Melvin Kohn and his colleagues, data gathered from various countries over the last three decades have shown that class structure is a significant aspect in understanding how parents socialize their children. Middle-class parents have consistently demonstrated different child-rearing patterns in contrast with their working-class counterpart. Parent's occupation, with the concomitant contextual requirement, is thus argued to impose preferential values with regard to child-rearing practice. The conclusion appears to be universally valid and becomes a consensus. This study argues that besides the manifest effect of parent's occupation, the social norms imbedded may serve a more powerful explanation and should be taken into account. It is long been recognized that cultural practice (including family socialization) is constrained by common social values which are diverse and sometimes opposite among different societies. Specifically, filial piety, interpersonal harmony, honor and trust, etc. are deep-rooted Asian values, and are not necessarily equivalent to Western values of obedience and popularity. It will be interesting to explore possible effects on the intergenerational transmission of family values between cultural norms and personal resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".