MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508156776 · doi:10.1080/00958972.2016.1226503

Alkylation of [Pt<sub>2</sub>(μ-S)<sub>2</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>] with boronic acid derivatives

2016· article· en· W2508156776 on OpenAlexafffund
Oguejiofo T. Ujam, Ogochukwu E. Offie, P. O. Ukoha, Allen G. Oliver, Joshua I. Ume, Rhonda L. Stoddard, J. Scott McIndoe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Coordination Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsChemistryZwitterionElectrospray ionizationReactivity (psychology)Medicinal chemistryElectrospray mass spectrometryAlkylationBoronMass spectrometrySalt (chemistry)Crystal structureTriflic acidSulfideNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopySingle crystalStereochemistryElectrosprayCrystallographyOrganic chemistryCatalysisMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reactivity of the metalloligand [Pt2(μ-S)2(PPh3)4] with the boron-functionalized alkylating agents BrCH2(C6H4)B(OR)2 (R = H or C(CH3)2) was investigated by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) in real time using pressurized sample infusion (PSI). The macroscopic reaction of [Pt2(μ-S)2(PPh3)4] with one mole equivalent of alkylating agents BrCH2(C6H4)B{OC(CH3)2}2 and BrCH2(C6H4)B(OH)2 gave the dinuclear monocationic μ-sulfide thiolate complexes [Pt2(μ-S){μ-SCH2(C6H4)B{OC(CH3)2}2}(PPh3)4]+ and [Pt2(μ-S){μ-S+CH2(C6H4)B(OH)(O−)}(PPh3)4]. The products were isolated as the [PF6]− salt and zwitterion, respectively, and fully characterized by ESI-MS, IR, 1H and 31P NMR spectroscopy, and single-crystal X-ray structure determinations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Coordination ChemistrySame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207