MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508165122 · doi:10.2118/181320-ms

Solvent Retrieval During Miscible Flooding in Heterogeneous Reservoirs Using New Generation Nano EOR Materials: Visual Analysis Through Micro Model Experiments

2016· article· en· W2508165122 on OpenAlexafffund
Jingwen Cui, Tayfun Babadagli

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicromodelSolventEnhanced oil recoveryPetroleum engineeringWettingChemical engineeringMaterials scienceWater injection (oil production)ImbibitionViscous fingeringLight crude oilOil in placeChemistryPetroleumOrganic chemistryPorous mediumGeologyComposite materialPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Solvent injection has been given attention to enhance oil recovery by sole use or in combination with a thermal method to develop light and heavy-oil fields. To make this process efficient, one needs to retrieve the expensive solvent. This can be achieved by alternative injection of water if the reservoir is homogeneous. In case of heterogeneous reservoirs (fractured carbonates or sands with wormholes), one needs to develop techniques other than viscous displacement to retrieve the solvent diffused into less permeable matrix portion. A method of injecting low temperature steam/water to heat the solvent to vaporize and retrieve it was introduced recently. An alternative is to inject chemical solution to change the wettability and displace the matrix oil/solvent by capillary imbibition. Although it yields lower recoveries, injection of chemical solutions for the same purpose without pre-solvent treatment might be an efficient (more economical) EOR method. A series of 2-D etched glass micromodel (sandstone replica with a fracture) experiments were designed to investigate the mechanics of chemical injection with and without pre-solvent injection. Conventional surfactants (sulfonate series) as well as new generation chemicals (nanofluids, ionic liquids) were tested for this purpose. After testing and screening effective chemicals without pre-solvent injection, the same chemicals were used to retrieve the solvent and recovery additional oil for pre-solvent injected systems. The micromodel was saturated by dyed processed oils and a selected solvent was injected through the fracture. After the solvent was diffused into matrix completely to recover the oil in it, the model was heated mimicking a thermal method to reach the boiling point of the solvent and retrieve it. Following the heating phase, aqueous phase was injected to retrieve the remaining solvent in the liquid or vapor phase. Visual observations on chemical flooding process clarified the complex interactions among different phases considering small-scale heterogeneities. This information can help screen promising chemical and determine the efficiency of chemical injection with and without pre-solvent injection for EOR in heterogeneous sands and carbonates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207