MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508178611

Crusader America: Democratic Imperialism under Wilson and Bush

2009· article· en· W2508178611 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Omar G. Encarnación

Bibliographic record

Venuee_Buah · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Economy and Marxism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork UniversityYale UniversityAndrew W. Mellon Foundation
KeywordsDemocracyPolitical sciencePolitical economyLawSociologyPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En un intento por racionalizar la invasión americana en Irak y con el propósito de impulsar la democracia en Oriente Medio, la administración de Bush confió plenamente en las ideas sobre el “imperialismo democrático” desarrolladas ocho décadas antes por la administración de Wilson, cuyo objetivo era impulsar los modelos democráticos en América Latina. El elemento clave en esta aproximación democrática es la percepción referente a la difusión de la democracia como una fuente de paz y orden en las relaciones internacionales. Los principios democráticos se entienden, por tanto, como un valor universal capaz de superar las fronteras culturales, históricas y geográficas; además se parte del principio ideológico según el cual los Estados Unidos, cuna de estos principios democráticos, tienen obligación moral de expandir los principios de libertad y democracia al resto del mundo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee_BuahSame topicPolitical Economy and MarxismFrench-language works237,207