Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article propose une réflexion sur les pouvoirs associés aux remèdes humanitaires et autochtones dans la préservation de la vie comme dans la provocation de la mort. Qu’elle soit attribuée à l’inaccessibilité aux biomédicaments comme le sous-tendent les pratiques de Médecins sans frontières (MSF) ou qu’elle soit allouée, chez les Madija-Kulina, aux pouvoirs que tire le chaman de l’incorporation de certaines plantes, la mort permet aux savoirs biomédicaux cosmopolites et aux savoirs thérapeutiques autochtones de se rencontrer en vue de la défier. Divers témoignages relatifs à l’usage des remèdes ont été recueillis dans le cadre d’un projet de MSF-Hollande auprès des autochtones du Médio Solimões (Amazonie brésilienne) et servent d’appui afin de démontrer les frontières fragiles entre les seuils nocif et bénéfique des remèdes. La rencontre des médecines constitue un moment propice pour lire les risques reliés aux remèdes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".