MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508214422 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2016.7527441

Performance of DCSK system with blanking circuit for power-line communications

2016· article· en· W2508214422 on OpenAlexafffund
Georges Kaddoum, Navid Tadayon, Ebrahim Soujeri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBlankingRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceDifferential phaseKeyingElectronic engineeringBit error ratePhase-shift keyingModulation (music)Amplitude and phase-shift keyingQuadrature amplitude modulationChannel (broadcasting)Phase noiseControl theory (sociology)TelecommunicationsAcousticsPhysicsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Providing from the robustness of differential chaos shift keying (DCSK) against linear and non-linear channel distortions, in this paper, we propose using this non-coherent modulation with blanking device as a potential candidate for implementation in power-line communications. The performance of this system is analyzed in the general case where background, impulsive and phase noises exist. We derive the probability of blanking error as well as the bit error rate with and without blanking. Moreover, the proposed system is compared to differential phase shift keying (DPSK) modulation to highlight the robustness of DCSK scheme against phase noise imperfection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207