MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508268566 · doi:10.18293/seke2016-106

A Characterization of Negative User Stories

2016· article· en· W2508268566 on OpenAlexaff
Pankaj Kamthan, Nazlie Shahmir

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings/Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation and Cyber Security
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUser storyComputer scienceAgile software developmentContext (archaeology)Process (computing)Human–computer interactionWorld Wide WebSoftware engineeringSoftware developmentProgramming languageSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of an agile project, negative interactions are addressed by equipping the 'conventional' positive user story engineering process with a number of conceptual models, including those for negative user story and negative role. The challenges inherent in eliciting negative uses, negative roles, and negative user stories are highlighted. The cost of engineering negative user stories is analyzed. The relationships among positive and negative user stories are considered. For illustration, a detailed example is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings/Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge EngineeringSame topicInformation and Cyber SecurityFrench-language works237,207