MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508299185 · doi:10.3138/jcs.49.3.144

When Beer Was Off-side: Drink, Sport, and the Ideals of Civic Citizenship in Two Ontario Cities, 1934-44

2015· article· en· W2508299185 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Dan Malleck

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrideTemptationEntertainmentCitizenshipConfusionSociologyAdvertisingScrutinyBoroughLawPolitical sciencePublic administrationBusinessPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When licensed hotel beverage rooms were opened in Ontario in 1934, the Liquor Control Board tried to ensure that these places were located away from places where individuals assembled who might be vulnerable to temptation. Accordingly, the board refused licences to hotels located near churches, playgrounds, or schools. It also was wary of licensing places near hockey arenas. Considerable confusion arose, therefore, when hotels sought licences near Maple Leaf Gardens in Toronto and the Garden City Arena in St. Catharines. The former was a major professional entertainment complex, while the latter was a point of civic pride built at least partly through public subscription. The ensuing controversies in both cases underscore the conflicting relationship between healthy physical activity and morally questioned drinking spaces, while exploring the shifting priorities of a liquor control board that sought to ensure that alcohol was consumed by the public in a socially orderly manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0460.020
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207