MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508393929 · doi:10.14393/rep-v15n12016-rel03

Mulheres e educação: conhecendo a temática através da extensão universitária

2016· article· pt· W2508393929 on OpenAlexaff
Rita Sá Machado, Amanda Motta Castro

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Educação Popular · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Sexuality, and Education
Canadian institutionsWomen's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O Cine Debate "Mulheres e Educação" é um projeto de extensão realizado pela Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Campus Tefé (CEST/UEA), e que está inserido na relação pesquisa-extensão e ensino. O projeto foi desenvolvido no primeiro semestre de 2015. O objetivo principal foi levar aos/às estudantes o conhecimento e a reflexão sobre a temática das mulheres e sua história com a educação formal. Participaram das sessões de cinema cerca de 60 estudantes e professores/ as, oriundos/as dos diversos cursos de licenciatura da UEA e das escolas públicas do município de Tefé, Amazonas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Educação PopularSame topicGender, Sexuality, and EducationFrench-language works237,207