MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508420194 · doi:10.14504/ajr.2.2.1

Off Gas Measurements from FR Materials Exposed to a Flash Fire

2015· article· en· W2508420194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAATCC Journal of Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal and Kinetic Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlash (photography)Thermal decompositionDecompositionEnvironmental scienceScale (ratio)Energetic materialExplosive materialNuclear engineeringForensic engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryEngineeringPhysicsOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decomposition of flame resistant (FR) materials, either through elevated temperature or contact with flames, results in a range of chemical species, some of which can be quite toxic to humans. Small scale or bench scale tests for decomposition products have been done in the past, but there were always questions as to whether these were representative of full-scale flash fire test results. To determine whether the decomposition products would be of sufficient quantity to measure and whether different FR materials would produce a “signature” set of compounds, full scale testing was undertaken. Coveralls constructed from four common FR materials were evaluated. The methodology used allowed the determination of the thermal decomposition products of FR materials when exposed to flash fire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.241
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it