MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508463822 · doi:10.21767/2171-6625.1000128

Brain Connectivity as Potential Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease

2016· article· en· W2508463822 on OpenAlexaff
Siddhartha Mondragón Rodríguez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology and Neuroscience · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsNeuroscienceDiseaseBiomarkerOptogeneticsNeurologyNeuroimagingPsychologyComputer scienceMedicinePathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One important challenge for the Alzheimer's disease research field is developing new and efficacious biomarkers. In this regard we have devoted significant efforts towards finding biomarkers that are able to detect the prodromal pathological stage at an early phase. The idea behind this picture is to detect early stage points in order to provide better treatment options. Here, we firmly believe that this strategy will offer better hope for patients. With this in mind, we discuss the use of brain circuit alterations as a potential tool for early time point detection. Additionally, we briefly discuss the combination of powerful new techniques, like optogenetics and magnetic resonance imaging, for new diagnosis and treatment strategies. The short document will be an important contribution towards exploring new strategies for AD diagnosis and treatment. Given the practical application of these data, we feel that this manuscript will be of significant interest to the audience of Journal of Neurology and Neuroscience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology and NeuroscienceSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207