Multimodal 2D–3D face recognition using local descriptors: pyramidal shape map and structural context
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the authors propose a local descriptor based multimodal approach to improve face recognition performance. Pre‐processing is done to smooth, resample, and register data. The resampled three‐dimensional (3D) face data are applied to extract novel descriptors including pyramidal shape index, pyramidal curvedness, pyramidal mean, and Gaussian curvatures. Proposed pyramidal shape maps are extracted at each level of the Gaussian pyramid on each point of the 3D data to have 2D matrices as representatives of 3D geometry information. A local descriptor structural context histogram, which represents the structure of the image using scale invariant feature transform, is calculated on pyramidal shape map descriptors and texture image to find matched keypoints in 3D and 2D modality, respectively. Score‐level fusion by means of sum rule is employed to get a final matching score. Experimental results on the Face Recognition Grand Challenge (FRGC v2) database illustrate verification rates of 99 and 98.65% at 0.1% false acceptance rate for all versus all and ROC III experiments, respectively. On Bosphorus database, verification rate of 95.8% for neutral versus all experiment has been achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it