Validation of the Spanish Version of the Inventory of Suicide Orientation - ISO 30 in Adolescent Students of Educational Institutions in Medellin - Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inventory of Suicide Orientation - ISO 30, it is a self-report scale that measures risk of adolescents suicideorientation. Although the risk of adolescents suicide is on the public agenda in Colombia actually, there is no studyto analyze the psychometric properties of ISO 30, and for this reason, the present study is conducted with a randomsample of 604 adolescent students (48% were male and 52% female with an average age of 14 and a deviation of 1.9years). Methods: A confirmatory factor analysis was performed; reliability is checked by the Cronbach's alpha andcorrelation item-subconstruct to which it belongs; The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with the RFL-Avalidated scale in Colombia with teenage school people is verified. AMOS 16.0 and SPSS version 20.0 for dataprocessing was used. Results: this population was confirmed in the same factorial structure of the original scale; sodoes the internal consistency for the 30 items and the correlation of each item with its own subconstruct: socialisolation and marginalization, low self-esteem, inability to manage emotions, suicidal ideation and hopelessness.Conclusion: The Inventory of Suicide Orientation - ISO 30 Spanish version, is a useful questionnaire and appropriateto diagnose the risk of suicidal orientation (which is a prelude to suicidal idea) in the adolescents students people inMedellin city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".