Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sirviéndome de las teorías de Jacques Derrida, Cathy Caruth, Linda Hutcheon, Jan Assman y Pierre Nora, entre otros, examino las maneras en las cuales tres dramaturgos de distintas realidades – un autor consagrado, Antonio Buero Vallejo; un joven prometedor, Jerónimo López Mozo; y un exiliado, José Antonio Rial – dieron pie a lo que denomino la meta-memoria histórica: la confrontación manifiesta y el cuestionamiento teatral de las divergencias, sombras y verdades polifacéticas asociadas con las memorias colectivas simultáneas y posteriores a la Guerra Civil española. Concretamente, los dramaturgos utilizan la memoria explícita – expresada mediante la anacronía, la metateatralidad, y/o el recurso a personajes que son muertos vivientes –, con el fin de resaltar la continua reconstrucción de la historia colectiva. En las postrimerías del franquismo, sus tres piezas respectivas, El tragaluz (1967), Guernica (1969) y La muerte de García Lorca (1969), entablan un diálogo intertextual, fragmentado e indeterminado entre el pasado y el presente. Estas tres obras auguran una estética que cobra cada vez más relieve en el teatro español, a medida que se ha ido tanteando dicho pasado traumático en España durante las últimas cuatro décadas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".