MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508826171 · doi:10.1109/icton.2016.7550606

Anycast (re)routing of multi-period traffic in dimensioning resilient backbone networks for multi-site data centers

2016· article· en· W2508826171 on OpenAlexafffund
Ting Wang, Brigitte Jaumard, Chris Develder

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConcordia University
KeywordsAnycastDimensioningComputer networkComputer scienceRouting (electronic design automation)Period (music)MacrocellDistributed computingBase stationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of dimensioning resilient backbone networks for cloud-like scenarios where demand is to be served at one among several candidate data centers (DCs), and where that demand varies over time, which we assume to be slotted. We thus consider multi-period traffic, for which we need to find routes to both a primary DC and a backup DC (in case the primary, or the network connection towards it, fails) and account also for synchronization traffic (following its own routes) between the two chosen DCs. We propose a path formulation and adopt a column generation approach: the (restricted) master problem (RMP) selects “configurations” to use for each demand in each of the time periods, while pricing problems (PPs) construct new, potentially cost-reducing configurations for a given demand. Our model allows for several PPs to be solved in parallel, and we demonstrate the time savings achieved by doing so. We compare several anycast (re)routing strategies, where we allow traffic that spans multiple periods to either (i) not be rerouted in different periods, (ii) only change the backup DC and routes, or (iii) freely change both primary and backup DC choices and routes towards them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207