MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2508912864 · doi:10.1097/adt.0000000000000091

Alcohol Use Among Persons on Methadone Treatment

2016· article· en· W2508912864 on OpenAlexafffund
Ján Klimas, Huiru Dong, Sabina Dobrer, Michael John Milloy, Thomas Kerr, Evan Wood, Kanna Hayashi

Bibliographic record

VenueAddictive Disorders & Their Treatment · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Paul's Hospital
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseIrish Research CouncilEuropean CommissionNational Institutes of HealthMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsMethadoneMedicinePsychiatryMethadone maintenance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read with interest Dr Varshney et al.'s article on brief interventions for alcohol use among persons on maintenance treatment published ahead-of-print on August 11, 2015. While alcohol is found in the majority of drug-related deaths that involve illicit drugs, around the globe, maintenance therapy with methadone (MMT), or buprenorphine, reduces morbidity and mortality among people who use opiates. Although one common clinical challenge is comorbid alcohol use and opioid use disorder, with guidelines often recommending withholding methadone in this context given the potential for fatal overdose due to drug interactions, alcohol's impact on the health outcomes of MMT patients has been 'overlooked and underestimated'. Therefore, we examined the impact of heavy alcohol use on mortality among MMT patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAddictive Disorders & Their TreatmentSame topicOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentFrench-language works237,207