MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509029362 · doi:10.2524/jtappij.68.168

A Report on ISWFPC 2013

2014· article· en· W2509029362 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsVancouver Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulp and paper industryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2013年6月12日~14日にカナダ・バンクーバー市で,International Symposium on Wood, Fibre and Pulping Chemistry2013(第17回木材化学・繊維化学・蒸解化学国際シンポジウム)がPAPTAC(カナダ紙パルプ技術協会)主催で開催された。大会には16か国から183名が参加した。口頭発表は11分野91件行われ,103件のポスター発表が行われた。本大会では,蒸解・漂白に関する研究や木材リファイナリー技術に関する研究発表が中心で,特に蒸解プロセスから副産するヘミセルロースおよびリグニンから付加価値の高い化学物質の製造技術,バイオエタノール生産前処理技術およびナノセルロース製造に関する研究発表が多かった。木質バイオマスのマテリアル利用の技術開発に注目が集まっている印象を受けた。本稿では,大会および研究発表の概要を中心に紹介する。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it