MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509089058 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2016.7527378

Aerosol Jet Printing for printed electronics rapid prototyping

2016· article· en· W2509089058 on OpenAlexafffund
Anubha A. Gupta, Antoine Bolduc, Sylvain G. Cloutier, Ricardo Izquierdo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanomaterials and Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMaterials sciencePrinted electronics3D printingFabricationScreen printingRapid prototypingSubstrate (aquarium)NozzlePEDOT:PSSOptoelectronicsInkwellLayer (electronics)NanotechnologyComposite materialMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work investigates optimization procedures for rapid prototyping with Aerosol Jet Printing by printing high quality structures for the fabrication of multi-layer passive devices on various substrates. The effects of gas flow rate, nozzle diameter, stage speed and substrate temperature are examined in order to optimize printed line width for each material. Inductors, capacitors and resistors are fabricated using silver nano-particle ink, SU-8 dielectric and PEDOT:PSS organic conductor. Further applications are show-cased by printing silver interconnect lines with fine pitch for various applications such as: replacement for die wirebonding, printing a strain gauge on a 3D conformal surface, and for printing on flexible plastic substrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNanomaterials and Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207