Oxidation-reduction equilibria of ferrous/ferric ions in oxide melts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxidation-reduction equilibrium experiments were conducted with oxide melts containing CaO, Li2O, Al2O3, ZnO, B2O3, SiO2 and small concentrations of iron oxide. The results indicated that for compositions within the acidic regime, the ratio {(Fe3+)/(Fe2+) PO21/4} decreased with an increase in basicity while for relatively basic melts, the ratio increased with an increase in basicity. This variation of {(Fe3+)/(Fe2+) PO21/4} could be interpreted in terms of the optical basicity of the glass melts and is consistent with the following expressions for the red-ox equilibria within acidic and relatively basic melts, respectively: In an acidic melt, the temperature dependence of the reaction yielded an enthalpy value which was in excellent agreement with the enthalpy change for the reaction: For a relatively basic melt, the enthalpy value for the corresponding reaction was about half of that found for the acidic melt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".