MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509265160 · doi:10.1149/07514.0955ecst

Developing Cobalt Doped Pr<sub>0.5</sub>Ba<sub>0.5</sub>MnO<sub>3-δ</sub> Electrospun Nanofiber Bifunctional Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction and Oxygen Evolution Reaction

2016· article· en· W2509265160 on OpenAlexaff
Yaqian Zhang, Yifei Sun, Jing‐Li Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverpotentialCatalysisBifunctionalElectrospinningMaterials scienceNanofiberOxygen evolutionChemical engineeringCobaltPerovskite (structure)ElectrochemistryInorganic chemistryChemistryNanotechnologyComposite materialElectrodePhysical chemistryMetallurgyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The porous nanofiber Co doped Pr 0.5 Ba 0.5 MnO 3-δ (PrBaMnO) was successfully synthesized through electrospinning technology and served as a bifunctional catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction(OER). The catalytic activities of the composite catalyst consisting of 50 wt% perovskite catalyst and 50 wt% carbon black (CB) was investigated in alkaline solution. Comparing to the PrBaMnO parent perovskite, remarkable enhancement of ORR and OER performance were achieved on Pr 0.5 Ba 0.5 MnCo 0.2 O 3-δ with respect to decreased overpotential and increased current density. A maximum current density of 19.4 mA cm -2 was achieved at 1.95 V (versus. RHE) on Co doped Pr 0.5 Ba 0.5 MnO 3-δ electrospun nanofiber/CB composite catalyst in OER. In addition, a preferable four electron transfer pathway was demonstrated in the ORR process. All the electrochemical test results suggest the promising application of Co doped Pr 0.5 Ba 0.5 MnO 3-δ electrospun nanofiber/CB composite as an efficient bi-functional catalyst on fuel cells and metal-air batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207