Polarización sociopolítica y percepción del sistema normativo en Venezuela
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de esta investigación es analizar, desde una perspectiva psicosocial, la percepción de transgresión normativa y las repercusiones emocionales que ello trae aparejado, así como evaluar la relación con otras variables como la identificación con el colectivo nacional, la autoestima colectiva nacional y la auto-percepción de clase social de los participantes. Para ello se diseñó un estudio no-experimental, transversal, descriptivo-correlacional. Se aplicó un cuestionario auto administrado a 320 venezolanos residentes en Caracas. Los resultados del análisis de senderos indican que hay una mala percepción del sistema normativo asociada a sentimientos negativos, menores niveles de identificación con el colectivo nacional y de sentimientos de orgullo nacional. También se halló que los participantes que se autodefinen de clase más baja perciben más positivamente el sistema normativo que los de clase más alta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".