MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509318014

Enhanced ionization of the two-electron molecule H2 in intense laser fields : Mechanism of the creation of doorway states

2001· article· en· W2509318014 on OpenAlexaff
Isao Kawata, André D. Bandrauk, Hirohiko Kono, Y. Fujimura

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonizationAtomic physicsIonic bondingExcited statePhysicsGround stateAdiabatic processElectronPopulationElectron ionizationIonQuantum mechanics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the mechanism of enhanced ionization in the two electron molecule H 2 subjected to an ultrashort, intense laser pulse by solving exactly the time-dependent Schrodinger equation for a one-dimensional model. Results of the simulation are analyzed by using the field following three adiabatic states that are adiabatically connected with the lowest three essential electronic states of H 2 as a field changes. Ionization is enhanced when the excited ionic state H - H + is most efficiently created from the covalent ground state HH in the level dynamics prior to ionization. An analytic expression for the ionic and covalent crossing condition is also obtained in terms of the three essential states and agrees well with the numerical results. As the internuclear distance R decreases, the population of the H - H + created increases whereas the ionization rate from a pure H - H + state decreases owing to the stronger attraction by the distant nucleus. As a result, the ionization is most enhanced at intermediate internuclear R (6) range where covalent and ionic configurations cross.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaser PhysicsSame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207