MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509507984 · doi:10.5539/jfr.v5n5p77

Using Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) by-products to Cultivate Lactobacillus reuteri spp.

2016· article· en· W2509507984 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDate Palm Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNorth Carolina Agricultural and Technical State UniversityNorth Carolina State UniversityU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsPhoenix dactyliferaLactobacillus reuteriFood scienceChemistryLactobacillusFermentationBacterial growthBacteriaLactic acidPalmBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are used by industry to produce fermented food products. The standard media used to cultivate LABs is DeMan Rogosa Sharp (MRS). However, it is expensive. Alternative low-cost media must be developed for industrial use. A good source for growth media components are by-products generated during the production of agricultural goods, such as dates. Our objective was to investigate the use of date by-products for cultivating Lactobacillus reuteri. Date palm extract (DPE) was prepared by pressing fresh date fruits for one week and diluting 1:2 with diH2O, centrifuging at 4696 x g and 4°C 25 min, and autoclaving the supernatant at 110°C for 15 min. An MRS-based buffer solution was added to DPE make a date palm medium (DPM). DPM was then enriched with various amounts phytone peptone (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 %, w/v). The enriched DPMs were used to cultivate three strains of Lactobacillus reuteri: DSM 20016, CF2-7F, and SD 2112. Our results showed that in the DPM minus phytone peptone, bacterial counts reached 3.18 ± 0.5 log CFU/mL. Addition of lower amounts of phytone peptone did not improve bacterial growth. However, DPM medium supplemented with 0.8% phytone peptone improved the bacterial counts, which reached 6.94 ± 0.1 log CFU/mL, similar to what was observed with MRS (7.90± 0.24 log CFU/mL). There was no significant difference in the growth of LAB in MRS and phytone peptone enriched media DPM (p > 0.05). Date by-products are potentially alternative low cost components of LAB growth media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it