MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509527387 · doi:10.4000/communication.6489

Gaëtan TREMBLAY et Bernard MIÈGE (dir.) (1998), « Théories sociales de la communication et théories communicationnelles de la société »

2000· article· fr· W2509527387 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Éric George

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Urban Networks and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesConstitutionPhilosophySociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consacrer le numéro d’une revue à un état des lieux au sein d’une discipline, en l’occurrence les sciences de la communication, n’est pas aisé. Mais le faire dans une revue habituellement consacrée aux études sur le loisir est encore moins évident. Certes, le loisir et la communication peuvent être considérés comme des objets de recherche qui se recoupent partiellement, mais leur constitution en tant que disciplines est fondamentalement différente, ne serait-ce que parce que l’un, le loisir, ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicGlobal Urban Networks and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207