MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509561218 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.205303

Charge density wave with meronlike spin texture induced by a lateral superlattice in a two-dimensional electron gas

2016· article· en· W2509561218 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Côté, Xavier Bazier-Matte

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsLandau quantizationGround stateSuperlatticeSpinsFermi gasAntiferromagnetismElectronSpin (aerodynamics)Charge density waveSuperconductivityAtomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The combined effect of a lateral square superlattice potential and the Coulomb interaction on the ground state of a two-dimensional electron gas in a perpendicular magnetic field is studied for different rational values of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}$, the inverse of the number of flux quanta per unit cell of the external potential, at filling factor $\ensuremath{\nu}=1$ in Landau-level $N=0.$ When Landau-level mixing and disorder effects are neglected, increasing the strength ${W}_{0}$ of the potential induces a transition at a critical strength of ${W}_{0}^{(c)}$ from a uniform and fully spin-polarized state to a two-dimensional charge density wave (CDW) with a meronlike spin texture at each maximum and minimum of the CDW. The collective excitations of this ``vortex CDW'' are similar to those of the Skyrme crystal that is expected to be the ground-state near filling factor $\ensuremath{\nu}=1$. In particular, a broken $U(1)$ symmetry in the vortex CDW results in an extra gapless phase mode that could provide a fast channel for the relaxation of nuclear spins. The average spin-polarization ${S}_{z}$ changes in a continuous or discontinuous manner as ${W}_{0}$ is increased depending on whether $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}\ensuremath{\in}[1/2,1]$ or $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}\ensuremath{\in}[0,1/2]$. The phase mode and the meronlike spin texture disappear at a large value of ${W}_{0}$ leaving as the ground state a partially spin-polarized CDW if $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}\ensuremath{\ne}1/2$ or a spin-unpolarized CDW if $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}=1/2.$

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicQuantum and electron transport phenomenaFrench-language works237,207