MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509597693 · doi:10.1130/ges01277.1

New constraints on the magma distribution and composition beneath Volcán Uturuncu and the southern Bolivian Altiplano from magnetotelluric data

2016· article· en· W2509597693 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeosphere · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMagnetotelluricsMagmaElectrical resistivity and conductivityVolcanoMagma chamberAndesiteDiapirPetrologySeismologyTectonicsVolcanic rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetotelluric (MT) data were used to create a three-dimensional electrical resistivity model of the Altiplano-Puna magma body (APMB) in the area surrounding Volcán Uturuncu in southern Bolivia. This volcano is at the center of a zone of surface deformation with a diameter of 150 km and persistent inflation of ∼10 mm/yr. Low electrical resistivities (<3 Ωm) at a depth of 14 + 1/–3 km below sea level (16–20 km below surface) are interpreted as being due to the presence of andesite melts in the APMB, and require a minimum melt fraction of 15%. The upper crustal resistivity structure is characterized by finite-length, dike-shaped conductors, oriented approximately east-west near sea level. A combination of dacite partial melts and aqueous fluids is required to explain the observed low-resistivity values. Geodetic data do not require any deformation in these shallow regions. The geometry of the upper surface of the APMB beneath Volcán Uturuncu is consistent with that predicted by geodynamic models that suggest that the APMB bulges upward directly beneath Volcán Uturuncu, near the measured inflation center (∼3 km west of Volcán Uturuncu). Viscosity estimates from the MT-derived resistivity model gives a maximum value of 1016 Pa·s and is consistent with models that propose diapir-like ascent of magma above the APMB. Resistivity models are compared and quantitatively correlated to seismic velocity models, showing good agreement on the spatial extent and depth of the APMB. A forward modeling study shows that the small differences in the depth to the top of the APMB between the different geophysical methods could be explained by variations in the composition of the magma body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it