Atypical thermal transport in Cu nanorods in the diffusive–ballistic crossover
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a simple theoretical calculation scheme based on the phenomenological Fourier heat-flow formalism to study thermal transport behaviors in nanoscale copper rods. The axial heat transport is characterized by a new super-oscillatory feature along with small-amplitude heat spikes. It is anticipated that these atypical spikes are generated by accumulation of localized “hotspots” that have low heat dissipation characteristics. In the case of radial transport, we witness the existence of three distinct heat regimes owing to buildup of hot electrons after experiencing ballistic scattering events. It is important to note that, even though the nanorod diameter is comparable to or smaller than the electron mean free path length, λ mfp ∼ 30 nm; multiple ballistic electronic scattering from the outer surface of the nanorods and subsequent accrual into several layers through secondary collisional events has led to concentric heat zones. The hotspots disappear when the nanorod diameter exceeds λ mfp .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".