MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509621774 · doi:10.1002/art.39664

Role of Anti–Carbamylated Protein Antibodies Compared to Anti–Citrullinated Protein Antibodies in Indigenous North Americans With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Their First‐Degree Relatives, and Healthy Controls

2016· article· en· W2509621774 on OpenAlexafffund
Hester Koppejan, Leendert A. Trouw, Jeremy Sokolove, Lauren J. Lahey, T. Huizinga, Irene Smolik, D. B. Robinson, Hani El‐Gabalawy, René E. M. Toes, Carol Hitchon

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis & Rheumatology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekInstitute of Musculoskeletal Health and ArthritisZonMwCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchEuropean Commission
KeywordsRheumatoid arthritisFirst-degree relativesMedicineAutoantibodyAntibodyRheumatoid factorInterquartile rangeImmunologyInternal medicineArthritisGastroenterologyFamily history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies, including seropositivity for rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs). In addition, antibodies to carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP) are present in patients with RA and are associated with joint damage. This study was undertaken to assess the presence of anti-CarP antibodies in indigenous North Americans (First Nations [FN] populations) with RA compared to their at-risk first-degree relatives (FDRs) and healthy controls. METHODS: Anti-CarP IgG and ACPAs (specifically, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide [anti-CCP] antibodies) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the sera of FN patients with RA (n = 95), their unaffected FDRs (n = 109), and healthy FN controls (n = 85). Antibodies to additional citrullinated peptides were measured using a multiplex ACPA array, and the number of peptides recognized was reported as an ACPA score. Groups were compared using the chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test. Associations between RA and seropositivity for RF, ACPAs, and anti-CarP antibodies were determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: Anti-CarP antibodies were more frequent in FN patients with RA (44.3%) compared to FDRs (18.3%) and FN controls (4.7%) (both P < 0.0001 versus RA). Moreover, anti-CarP antibodies were more frequent in FDRs than in FN controls (P = 0.008). The ACPA score was higher in anti-CCP-positive FN patients with RA than in anti-CCP-positive FN FDRs (median score 7 [interquartile range (IQR) 7] versus median score 1 [IQR 4]; P = 0.04). The association with RA was strongest when all 3 autoantibodies (RF, anti-CCP, and anti-CarP) were present in the patients' serum (odds ratio 194, 95% confidence interval 23-1,609, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Anti-CarP antibodies are prevalent in FN patients with RA and also more common in their at-risk FDRs compared to healthy controls. The results indicate an association of RF, ACPAs, and anti-CarP with RA that is strongest when all 3 autoantibodies are present. These findings may provide new insights into the evolution of autoimmunity in preclinical RA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis & RheumatologySame topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesFrench-language works237,207