MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509687994 · doi:10.1109/cjece.2016.2584081

Photovoltaic Power Forecasting Model Based on Nonlinear System Identification

2016· article· en· W2509687994 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ayedh H. Alqahtani, Suhaila Marafi, Basim Musallam, Nour El Din Abd El Khalek

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemIdentification (biology)Electricity generationSystem identificationComputer scienceSystem dynamicsElectric power systemChristian ministryElectricityNonlinear system identificationPower (physics)EngineeringData modelingElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar photovoltaic (PV) energy sources are rapidly gaining potential growth and popularity compared with conventional fossil fuel sources. As the merging of the PV systems with existing power sources increases, reliable and accurate PV system identification is essential to address the highly nonlinear change in the PV system dynamic and operational characteristics. This paper deals with the identification of a PV system characteristic in the real-life environment in Kuwait. The studied PV system is located on the top of the Ministry of Electricity and Water and the Ministry of Public Works buildings. The identification methodology is discussed. A Hammerstein-Wiener model is identified and selected due to its suitability to capture the PV system dynamics. Measured input-output data are collected from the PV system to be used for the identification process. The data are divided into estimation and validation sets. Results and discussions are provided to demonstrate the accuracy of the selected model structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.150
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207