Effectiveness Trichoderma asperellum on the Growth Cocoa Seeds under the Old Cocoa Trees
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effect of Trichoderma asperellum on the growth of cocoa seedlings under cocoa stands around 20 years old, so that cocoa seedlings to be used as rootstock on approach grafting for the rehabilitation of the roots of cocoa plants are old, growing well. Research compiled by randomized block design with frequency variation application T. asperellum that, once, twice and three times application respectively of4 gr.L-1 each plant. The results of the research, granting T. asperellum on cocoa seedlings planted under old cocoa trees and is still productive, able to help overcome competition in the utilization of nutrients and water as well as other growth inhibiting factors, and the influential on the vegetative growth of cocoa seedlings. Frequency of the best is three times the application that provides the most effective results for growing cocoa seeds, the seed growing percentage of 100% and an average plant height of 144.45 cm; number of leaves 37 strands; stem diameter 12.22 mm; and total leaf area 1388.30 cm2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".