Considérations sur les représentations prohibitionnistes en Occident
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De la guerre au vice à la gestion socioéconomique des problèmes pouvant découler de la consommation de drogues, la prohibition nous montre qu’elle n’est pas nécessairement une solution avantageuse. D’abord, on ne comprend pas toujours pourquoi certaines substances sont prohibées et pourquoi d’autres sont en vente libre. Ensuite, la prohibition n’atteint pas son objectif premier qui est de réduire la consommation de drogues. Elle engendre plutôt plusieurs effets pervers. Ce texte note que les attitudes à l’endroit de l’usage non médical des drogues n’ont pas toujours été celles que nous avons connues au vingtième siècle. Il rappelle donc les jalons historiques qui ont conduit aux représentations prohibitionnistes telles que nous les connaissons en Occident. Il relève également les principaux effets pervers de la prohibition des drogues et conclut qu’elle est devenue une solution désuète.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".