MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509717588 · doi:10.1149/2.1081610jes

Development of a Liquid Cooled Battery Module

2016· article· en· W2509717588 on OpenAlexaff
HongGuang Sun, Regan Dixon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsGeneral Motors (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)Liquid metalDuct (anatomy)Battery packComputer coolingLithium-ion batteryMaterials scienceThermalNuclear engineeringInletMechanical engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringComposite materialThermodynamicsThermal management of electronic devices and systemsPhysicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the development of a liquid cooling system of battery module with lithium-ion prismatic metal can battery cells that can be used in hybrid electric vehicles (HEV). Initially, a design concept of a liquid cooled battery module is selected based on the functional requirements associated with maximum battery cell temperature rise, temperature uniformity across the battery module, temperature uniformity within each individual lithium-ion prismatic battery cell, and total pressure loss of the liquid cooling system. A three-dimensional battery module thermal model and an analytical optimization approach are developed for selected design concept of the liquid cooled battery module. Finally, by performing analytical optimization study to examine the effects of geometries of the inlet duct, manifold, and the outlet duct on battery module thermal behavior and total pressure loss of cooling system, the optimal design concept of liquid-cooled battery module is identified to maximize its durability and driving range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207