Localization of Indoor Mobile Robot Using Minimum Variance Unbiased FIR Filter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The demand of indoor localization has recently grown quickly in industries. In general, a localization system is required to be reliable, fast, and have high accuracy. In this paper, the ultrawideband (UWB) technique is combined with the inertial navigation sensor (INS) to form a coupled UWB/INS localization framework, which inherits the advantages from both components. A minimum variance unbiased finite impulse response (MVU FIR) method is then applied to obtain accurate position and velocity estimations from noisy measurements. Two experiments and several simulations are conducted. Compared with the traditional Kalman filter (KF) and particle filter, the MVU FIR filter exhibits better immunity to the errors about a priori knowledge of noise variances. It can handle the kidnapped problem, and recover from some extreme failures satisfactorily. Moreover, the MVU FIR filtering algorithm is fast and easily implementable. Its online computational time is even lower than that of the KF, which is favorable in localization applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".