MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2509953608 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.068

Impact of Product Platform and Market Demand on Manufacturing System Performance and Production Cost

2016· article· en· W2509953608 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia CIRP · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicProduct Development and Customization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityProduct (mathematics)Production (economics)Manufacturing engineeringOrder (exchange)Build to orderOrder processingProduct design specificationProduct designEngineeringEvent (particle physics)Computer scienceBusinessMarketingSupply chainDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the rapid change in customer demands and needs, manufacturers are increasingly shifting from mass productions to mass customizations. Product platform strategy, which is one of the enablers of mass customizations, has been implemented by many companies in order to offer a wide range of products that belong to a family. Recently, a new platform approach was developed where an optimal platform is formed for a product family and is customized for different variants by adding, removing, and/ or substituting platform components to form product variants as orders are received. In this paper, the effect of product platform design and customers' demand on the production cost is investigated using Discrete-Event Simulation (FlexSim). The product platform and the product platform scalability concepts are examined and compared. The findings of this research demonstrate that effective platform implementation has a direct effect on the overall production costs as well as improving customer satisfactions by offering the desired level of customized products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it