MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510068312

Interaction between learned and naturally selected features in the design of killer whale calls and their functions

2016· article· en· W2510068312 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Harald Yurk

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyWhalePredationClanEcologySocial learningForagingEvolutionary biologyCommunicationGeographyPsychologySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All cetaceans, and particularly all dolphins, rely heavily on acoustic signalling to survive and reproduce. The killer whale or orca is the largest dolphin and occurs in all ocean basins. Killer whales produce stereotyped calls with complex temporal and frequency structure that allow spectrographic distinction into different call components. Call components differ in directionality and attenuation and may be used to synchronize travelling and foraging behaviours by allowing recognition of whales at great distances and identification of the direction of approaching and moving senders. Killer whale communities or populations that avoid social contact may still occupy the same areas (sympatry). Members of these populations are distinguishable by ecological and social differences such as are prey preferences (fish versus mammals) and social behaviours. Mutually unintelligible call repertoires seemingly are drivers for social segregation. Calls appear to be learned traits transmitted from parent generation to offspring generation in stable matrilineal groups which form the basis of all well studied populations. This preference for social learning is the basis for stable long lasting vocal traditions or dialects and may also influence other stable behaviours such as prey preferences. The stability of dialects can be traced through the observation of acoustic divergence among groups: high dialect similarity among socializing and closely related groups diminishes with social and genetic distance leading to diverse and discrete call dialects among interbreeding clans and among non socializing, non-interbreeding communities. This pattern of selective social learning appears to be the root cause for distinct dialects which allows mate selection to avoid inbreeding and fosters cooperation among clan and community members while it also maintains social segregation and genetic isolation between non-cooperating mammal eating and fish eating populations. It is possible that call structure design together with call dialects allow killer whales to be highly efficient foragers living in tight knit genetically viable social communities at higher densities in a given area than would be possible without ecological segregation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207