MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510122326 · doi:10.1109/spawc.2016.7536897

Modified MRT and outage probability analysis for massive MIMO downlink under per-antenna power constraint

2016· article· en· W2510122326 on OpenAlexaff
Chi Feng, Yindi Jing

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecodingTelecommunications linkMIMOConstraint (computer-aided design)Computer scienceZero-forcing precodingTransmitter power outputAntenna (radio)Interference (communication)Probability density functionPower (physics)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioElectronic engineeringMathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmMathematicsTelecommunicationsTransmitterStatisticsBeamformingEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For single-cell multi-user massive multi-input-multi-output (MIMO) system downlink, we consider the per-antenna power constraint and propose a modified maximum-ratio-transmission (MRT) precoding scheme. The outage probability performance of the scheme are analyzed. To enable the analysis, we study the random behaviour of the signal-to-interference-plus-noise-ratio (SINR) and derive an approximation for the probability density function (pdf) of the interference power. Simulation results are shown to validate the theoretical derivations. Moreover, our work show that the massive MIMO system with per-antenna power constraint under the modified MRT precoding can achieve lower outage probability than that with a total power constraint under the standard MRT precoding, even though its power constraint is more strict.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207