MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510202787

Google Business Secrets

2016· article· en· W2510202787 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Uqbah Iqbal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSearch engine optimizationWorld Wide WebThe InternetComputer scienceMAGIC (telescope)StorytellingInternet privacyNarrativeLiteratureArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Written by N. K. Kusrini and translated by Muhammad Firdaus Ariff, this book explores the personalities behind the success of Google and how Google managed to reach the highest level and so respected by IT giant Microsoft. The success story of Google's search engine industry pioneered the world when the founder only a graduate student has inspire a lot IT fanatics worldwide. Google is now no longer just a search engine, its exceptional ability to make people think that Google has a magic to answer all questions. Google managed to overcome the race among competitive IT industry players and beat all the other search engines. In fact there are now synonymous with the term googling to find information during internet activities. This book contains eight chapters and use storytelling techniques to explain Google birth history, Google progress, Google work culture, Google products and services and Google technology ads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1730.191

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Internet Banking and CommerceSame topicICT Impact and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207