MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510238848 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22633

A novel fast dynamic optimization approach for complex multivariable chemical process systems

2016· article· en· W2510238848 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ping Liu, Guodong Li, Xinggao Liu, Zeyin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMultivariable calculusDiscretizationParameterized complexityComputationProcess (computing)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Optimization problemMathematicsAlgorithmControl (management)Control engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A novel fast dynamic optimization approach is proposed for complex multivariable chemical process systems, where the control variables are parameterized with different non‐uniform time grids and are treated as optimal decision variables to obtain the optimal switching structures for tackling the shortcoming caused by the conventional uniform parameterization method. Meanwhile, an adaptive fast calculation approach is proposed to calculate the differential equations so as to decrease the optimization time. The gradient formulae of decision variables are therefore further derived so that the conventional gradient‐based optimization algorithm can be utilized easily. Two well‐known complex multivariable systems in engineering are tested as illustrations and are compared with other literature reports in detail, where the uniform discretization control vector parameterization (ud‐CVP) method is also developed as the comparative base. Numerical results show that the proposed method can achieve better optimization results with fewer parameters and lower computation costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207