Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueJournal of Instrumentation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaH. Lundbeck A/SFondation Partager le SavoirEuropean Social FundCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueGeorgian National Science FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"British Columbia Knowledge Development FundCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftIsrael Science FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesAustrian Science FundOntario Innovation TrustNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAgence Nationale de la RechercheServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyNational Science FoundationLundbeckfondenCompute CanadaAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)CERNDanmarks GrundforskningsfondCanarie
KeywordsLarge Hadron ColliderAtlas (anatomy)Data acquisitionATLAS experimentComputer scienceData flow diagramSystems engineeringComputer hardwareOperating systemParticle physicsPhysicsDatabaseEngineering
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlex: This paper describes the data acquisition and high level trigger system of the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, as deployed during Run 1. Data flow as well as control, configuration and monitoring aspects are addressed. An overview of the functionality of the system and of its performance is presented and design choices are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.090
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
