MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510451129 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201602099

SPM Discrimination in Airborne TDEM Data - A Case Study from the Maniitsoq Area, Southwestern Greenland

2016· article· en· W2510451129 on OpenAlexaff
Nasreddine Bournas, Geoffrey Plastow, Alexander Prikhodko, Karl Kwan, Jean M. Legault, Paolo Berardelli, Scott M. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsNickel Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedrockGeologyGradiometerMaghemiteGeomorphologyMagnetiteRemote sensingPaleontologyMagnetometer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary SPM effects, which are mainly caused by fine-grained iron particles such as maghemite and magnetite constitute a geological noise in modern airborne transient Time Domain EM (TDEM) systems. Therefore, their identification and discrimination is important when exploring for bedrock conductors associated with metallic mineralisation such as nickel and sulphides. In the transient TDEM data, they are manifested by a power law decay fit at mid-late time close to -1. In this paper, we describe other approaches for identifying and discriminating SPM anomalies observed in the transient TDEM data from Greenland, including a) innovative dual-EM receiver configuration (vertical EM gradiometer), and b) a multiple criteria pattern recognition approach, based on maximum likelihood algorithm. As a result, many SPM-related detected by airborne TDEM surveys were identified and were hence discriminated from further follow-up. Diamond drill testing in 2016 performed on selected targets that were categorized as non-SPM related, has confirmed their link to bedrock conductors and sulphide mineralization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedingsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207