CACEV: A Cost and Carbon Emission-Efficient Virtual Machine Placement Method for Green Distributed Clouds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distributed clouds have recently attracted many cloud providers and researchers as a topic of intensive interest. High energy costs and carbon emissions are two significant problems in distributed clouds. Due to the geographic distribution of data centers (DCs), there are a variety of resources, energy prices and carbon emission rates to consider in a distributed cloud, which makes the placement of virtual machines (VMs) for cost and carbon efficiency even more critical than in centralized clouds. Most previous work in this field investigated either optimizing cost without considering the amount of produced carbon or vice versa. This paper presents a cost and carbon emission-efficient VM placement method (CACEV) in distributed clouds. CACEV considers geographically varying energy prices and carbon emission rates as well as optimizing both network and server resources at the same time. By combining prediction-based A* algorithm with Fuzzy Sets technique, CACEV makes an intelligent decision to optimize cost and carbon emission for providers. Simulation results show the applicability and performance of CACEV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".