The physiology of juvenile shortnose sturgeon (<i>Acipenser</i> <i>brevirostrum</i>) during an acute saltwater challenge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One-year-old shortnose sturgeons (Acipenser brevirostrum LeSueur, 1818) were exposed to seawater (32 ppt) and brackish water (16 and 24 ppt) for 12, 24, 48, and 72 h and % body mass loss, plasma ions, energy metabolites, and oxygen-carrying variables were measured to evaluate survival and the physiological response to the acute salinity challenges. Survival in seawater was poor and plasma ion concentration was elevated in seawater. In sturgeons exposed to 24 ppt brackish water, ion concentrations remained elevated for 48 h, but began to decrease by 72 h. Fish exposed to 16 ppt brackish water did not show significant changes in ion concentrations over the 72 h period. Exposure to 32 ppt seawater resulted in significant and large decreases in body mass (about 20%–25%), whereas body mass loss was significantly less in fish exposed to 16 and 24 ppt brackish water. Overall, these findings suggest that juvenile sturgeons are able to tolerate lower salinities well but are less capable to endure higher salinities even on the short term (>48 h). These results suggest that juvenile A. brevirostrum could inhabit brackish environments earlier than previously expected, and that there appears to be a threshold at which salinity becomes a significant stress to these animals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".