MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510767746

DIACHRONIC STUDY OF INUIT DIETS UTILIZING TRACE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

2016· article· en· W2510767746 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melissa Connor, D. C. Slaughter

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Anthropology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrontiumTrace elementArchaeologyRange (aeronautics)HerbivoreTrophic levelGeographyEcologyBiologyGeologyChemistryGeochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This preliminary study uses trace element analysis of human bone in a diachronic investigation of north west Alaska Inuit diets. Bone mineral levels for nine elements are meas- ured. Presently, stable strontium appears to be the trace element that is most reliable as a dietary indicator. Strontium is incorporated into bone tissue in varying amounts depending upon regional geochemistrj^ and the trophic level of the species under study. Plants generally contain higher levels of strontium than do mammals. Previous dietarjr studies using this element have investigated the relative importance of plant foods in archaeological populations. Because of high levels of strontium in sea water, sea mammals absorb more of this element than do terrestrial mammals. Since Inuit diets contain only negligible amounts of plant foods, elevated levels of strontium in Inuit bone should reflect heavy subsistence use of sea mammals. The trace element content of bone from six Inuit populations is analyzed. Geographically these groups range from Cape Krusenstern to Barrow, and chronologically they range from the early Christian era to the late nineteenth century. As a control, the trace element content of marine predator and terrestrial herbivore bore is also analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArctic AnthropologySame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207