MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510811649 · doi:10.3391/mbi.2016.7.3.07

Volume and contents of residual water in recreational watercraft ballast systems

2016· article· en· W2510811649 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Todd Verboomen, Gary R. Montz, Titus S. Seilheimer

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement of Biological Invasions · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Navigation and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWinston Churchill Memorial TrustAustralian GovernmentDepartment of Conservation, New Zealand
KeywordsWatercraftBallastResidualEnvironmental scienceRecreationMarine engineeringFisheryComputer scienceGeologyEcologyOceanographyEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coral reef systems are in global decline.In Australia, much of this decline has been attributable to cyclic outbreaks (every ~17 years) of the coral-feeding crown-of-thorns seastar.While a native species, when in large enough densities the seastar acts like an invasive pest.Since 2012 the Australian government has invested significantly in a targeted control program using lethal injection.While this program is effective for individual reefs, it is not a complete strategy for the entire Great Barrier Reef (~2,500 reefs).In order to find a longer-term solution to the problem, in 2015, the lead author travelled to New Zealand, the United States, and Canada under a Churchill Fellowship to understand successful aquatic integrated pest management strategies and their potential application to the Great Barrier Reef.Meetings and workshops were convened with experts who specialise in risk assessment, categorisation, and management of aquatic invasive species.The experts comprised academics, applied scientists, policy makers, and a not for profit community based invasive species council.Bioinvasion management and prioritisation of management effort using risk-based frameworks were reviewed for application to the crown-of-thorns seastar.This viewpoint is novel in its approach of applying invasive species tools and perspectives to a non-invasive, native marine pest.Early detection and rapid response is key to preventing the transition of the seastar from natural densities to outbreak densities.However given the seastar is a native species already established, when in outbreak mode a multifaceted post-border management approach is essential.Private support funding models, that bridge conservation and tourism/philanthropy have proved successful in New Zealand to supplement government funded marine reserve management -this is an approach which should be explored by Australia to help manage the seastar.Dedicated support and commitment is needed to break the issue-attention cycle.On the Great Barrier Reef, a dedicated biosecurity approach should be used to maintain the seastar at natural densities, increase the time between outbreaks, protect coral cover and increase resilience of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement of Biological InvasionsSame topicMaritime Navigation and SafetyFrench-language works237,207