MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2510957449 · doi:10.11575/prism/27719

Sea Ice Melt Onset Dynamics in the Northern Canadian Arctic Archipelago from RADARSAT, 1997-2014

2016· article· en· W2510957449 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mallik Mahmud

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchipelagoSea iceArcticArctic ice packGeologyOceanographyClimatologyThe arcticCryospherePhysical geographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An algorithm was developed to detect melt onset over Arctic sea ice using high-resolution SAR images from RADARSAT. The algorithm is based on the temporal evolution of the SAR backscatter coefficient (σ⁰), using an ice type specific threshold approach that also corrects for backscatter incidence angle variation. Using 4457 RADARSAT images, the algorithm was applied over sea ice in the northern CAA, thus generating a new time series of melt onset from 1997-2014. The mean annual melt onset date was on YD 164±4 (mid–June). No significant trend was found over the 18-year period, however, variability increased in post-2007 years. An earlier (later) melt onset was associated with increased (decreased) solar energy absorption and subsequently associated in lighter (heavier) September sea ice coverage in the northern CAA. RADARSAT estimates of melt onset were found to be in good agreement but more robust compared to passive microwave and scatterometer estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→