MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dirt Jumper: A New and Fast Evolving Botnet-for-DDoS

2013· article· en· W2511073537 on OpenAlexaff
Mariela Andrade, Natalija Vlajic

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Intelligent Computing Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBotnetJumperDenial-of-service attackDirtComputer scienceComputer securityEngineeringWorld Wide WebOperating systemThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In July 2011, a fairly new and rather aggressive strain of botnet-for-DDoS malware, named Dirt Jumper, was identified by Arbor Networks. Since then, numerous incidents of DDoS attacks involving this strain of malware have been reported. In this paper, we first give a general overview of Dirt Jumper's history, structure and operation as it has been documented on the Internet. Subsequently, we present the results of our own analysis of Dirt Jumper, conducted using the GFI Sandbox environment. We also provide an overview of Pandora DDoS toolkit -the latest offspring coming out of the Dirt Jumper family, which appeared on the black botnet marked in the early 2012. We conclude the paper by outlining some areas of continuing and future work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Intelligent Computing ResearchSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207