MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511078284 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2016.7539121

Generating voltage drop aware current budgets for RC power grids

2016· article· en· W2511078284 on OpenAlexafffund
Zahi Moudallal, Farid N. Najm

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIntel Corporation
KeywordsComputer scienceVoltage dropGridPower network designKey (lock)VoltageProcess (computing)Task (project management)Metric (unit)ChipPower (physics)Distributed computingComputer engineeringElectronic engineeringReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient verification of the chip power distribution network is a critical task in modern chip design. It should be done early in the design process where adjustments can be most easily incorporated. As an alternative to simulation based methods, vectorless verification is a class of techniques that requires user-specified current constraints (budgets), and checks if the corresponding worst-case voltage drops at all grid nodes are below user-specified thresholds. However, obtaining/specifying the current constraints remains a burdensome task for users. Recent literature has addressed the constraints generation problem by proposing the inverse problem: for a given grid, we would like to generate circuit current constraints which, if adhered to by the underlying logic, would guarantee grid safety. In this paper, we adopt the same framework. We develop an efficient algorithm for constraints generation that targets a key grid quality metric namely the uniformity of temperature distribution across the die area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207