MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CXCR7 Is Expressed in B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Cells and Mediates Their Transendothelial Migration.

2008· article· en· W2511093457 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Jalili, Neeta Shirvaikar, Imran Mirza, Sara Ilnitsky, Mark E.T. Penfold, Thomas J. Schall, Anna Janowska‐Wieczorek

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemotaxisTransfectionJurkat cellsCell cultureChemotaxis assayCXCR4Chemokine receptorFlow cytometryMolecular biologyChemokineB cellStromal cellCancer researchReceptorLeukemiaDownregulation and upregulationCell biologyBiologyChemistryImmunologyT cellAntibodyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The function of chemokine stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1 and its receptor CXCR4 in the pathobiology of hematological malignancies is known, but the role of another, newly identified receptor for SDF-1, RDC1/CXCR7, has not yet been defined. Thus we investigated whether CXCR7 plays a role in hematological malignancy. Using RT-PCR and flow cytometry analysis, we screened the expression of CXCR7 in 14 hematological cell lines and found that it is strongly expressed in all 5 B cell lines tested (Raji, NC- 37, NALM6, Ramos and REH) and weakly in two T cell lines( Jurkat and CEM) and 2 of 7 myeloid cell lines tested. Moreover, CXCR7 was also strongly expressed in all 9 patients diagnosed with B precursor ALL, very weakly in normal lymphocytes, and not at all in T precursor ALL samples, suggesting that CXCR7 is selectively expressed in B-cell ALL. Next we examined whether CXCR7 plays a role in the chemotaxis of these cells and found that its antagonist CCX733 (ChemoCentryx, Inc, Mountain View, CA) did not inhibit SDF-1-induced chemotaxis, indicating that CXCR7 does not play a significant role in the chemotactic activity of B-cell ALL. However, we found that CCX733 inhibited the transendothelial migration (TEM) of B cell lines and primary B precursor ALL cells in a dose-dependent manner, but the inactivated CXCR7 antagonist CCX226 did not. Moreover, transfection of the NALM6 with CXCR7 resulted in downregulation of CXCR4 and the TEM of such transfected cells was more inhibited by CCX733 than of wild-type cells. When we compared the roles of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in the TEM of these cells, we found that the CXCR7 antagonist totally inhibited the TEM of B cells at the low dose of 1mM, but the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 did not. On the other hand, the SDF- 1-induced TEM of T cell lines and primary T lymphoblasts was not significantly inhibited by CCX733, but was by AMD3100. CCX733 significantly prevented binding of NC-37 cell line to HUVEC (as shown by adhesion assay) which indicates that CXCR7 is likely required for the interaction of leukemic cells with endothelial cells and their extravasation. Moreover, because CXCR7 is known to be a receptor for the interferon-inducible T cell chemoattractant (I-TAC), we investigated whether the I-TAC/CXCR7 axis crosstalks with the SDF-1/CXCR7 axis in the trafficking of lymphoblastic cells. We found that I-TAC itself did not induce the TEM of NC-37 cells; pretreatment of NC-37 cells with I-TAC, but not with other chemokines (MCP-1 and MIG), inhibited TEM towards SDF-1; in contrast, pretreatment of MOLT-4 (T cells) with I-TAC did not block the TEM of MOLT-4 cells. In conclusion, we demonstrated that CXCR7 is expressed on B lymphoblasts, and the SDF-1/CXCR7 axis plays a crucial role in the trafficking of these cells, indicating that CXCR7 could be a therapeutic target in patients diagnosed with B precursor ALL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207