MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511125835 · doi:10.5539/jas.v8n9p115

Discrimination Based on Volatile Compounds and Differential Analysis of Chinese Dark Tea

2016· article· en· W2511125835 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hua‐Feng He, Ye Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTea Polyphenols and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryExtraction (chemistry)ChromatographyPartial least squares regressionSugarMass spectrometryRaw materialGas chromatography–mass spectrometryFood scienceMathematicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Simultaneous distillion and extraction (SDE)/gas chromatographymass spectrometry (Gc-Ms) detection coupled with partial least squares-discriminate analysis (PLS-DA) were used to discriminate Chinese dark teas (CDTs). A total of 84 volatile compounds were taken to conduct the cluster analysis. 9 kinds of CDTs could be divided into 3 groups in consistent with the manufacturing processes. Besides, ingredients that were related with the quality of CDT, such as free amino acid, soluble sugar and catechines were analyzed. Differential trends were disclosed between Pu-Er raw tea and Pu-Er ripe tea as well as raw dark green tea (RDGT).</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicTea Polyphenols and EffectsFrench-language works237,207