MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511134229 · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01137

New Method to Synthesize S-Doped TiO<sub>2</sub> with Stable and Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Performance under Indoor Sunlight Irradiation

2015· article· en· W2511134229 on OpenAlexafffund
Mingshan Zhu, Chunyang Zhai, Liqun Qiu, Cheng Lü, Andrew S. Paton, Yukou Du, M. Cynthia Goh

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhotocatalysisX-ray photoelectron spectroscopySunlightMaterials scienceCatalysisIrradiationVisible spectrumPhotochemistryDimethyl sulfoxideDegradation (telecommunications)DopingSolventChemical engineeringNanoparticleNanotechnologyNuclear chemistryChemistryOptoelectronicsOrganic chemistryOpticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we report a new, low-cost, and facile solvothermal approach to synthesize visible-light-active S-doped TiO 2 (S-TiO 2 ) by using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as both the S source and the solvent. Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) solidly confirmed the presence of S element in the final product. The as-prepared S-TiO 2 nanoparticles exhibited excellent and long-term stable photocatalytic performance for the degradation of organic pollutants under visible and indoor sunlight illumination. The catalyst still maintained high photoactivity even after several months of exposure to the indoor sunlight irradiation. This result suggests a new approach to achieve stable and highly efficient solar light driven photocatalysts for water purification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations151
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringSame topicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsFrench-language works237,207